Understanding Feminism in Susan Glaspells Trifles

Melissa Prather English 102 Research Paper May 8th, 2012 Understanding Feminism in Susan Glaspell’s Trifles Susan Glaspell lived during a time where women’s rights were not fully acknowledged. The oppression of women during this time stretched to the point that they were not truly acknowledged as their own person. They were to be seen and not heard so to speak. Their sole purpose was to take care of their families by keeping house and performing their caretaker duties. Glaspell even demonstrates in her story that the women in this town were referred to as someone’s wife and not as their own individual person. In her play titled Trifles, she shows that women are smarter than the men in their lives give them credit for. Glaspell†¦show more content†¦She saw this as a metaphor for what her husband was doing to her and she just could not handle it any longer (6). From what you can infer from this play, as Glaspell never shows you Minnie’s perspective, Minnie felt hopeless in her marriage and she had to find a way to get out. Divorce was not very highly looked upon during these times, so she felt that she had no other choice if she was going to survive. When they found Mrs. Wright in her home after the murder, she was rocking back and forth in her rocking chair. She was in a state of shock and panic. She knew what she did and she didn’t know how to process the information, just like she did not know what to do when she saw the canary. When she found the canary, she placed it in a box lined with silk where her scissors are usually kept. Brian Sutton made an excellent observation when he mentioned that Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters construed the box as a â€Å"present† because of the luxurious nature of the box (172). Her husband’s death, however, had been brutal. The men in the play look at things in a different light and miss major points in their investigation because of their lack of a feminine view. When the men enter the Wright’s house, they instantly comment on the state of their home. Instead of seeing the things the way that their wivesShow MoreRelatedSusan Glaspell s A Jury Of Her Peers1408 Words   |  6 PagesGrowing up in Iowa in the 1800s and 1900s, Susan Glaspell took inspiration for many of her stories from personal experiences. As a former courthouse reporter herself, Glaspell’s short story â€Å"A Jury of Her Peers† is based largely on her involvement with a murder case and a kitchen she recalled investigating. â€Å"A Jury of Her Peers,† a rendition of her early play, Trifles, focuses on the homicide of an abusive husband by his wife. While the men investigating the case overlook the various signs of abuseRead MoreThe Revolt Of Mother By Mary E. Wilkins Freeman And Trifles By Susan Glaspell1736 Words   |  7 PagesKeana Jones April 6, 2017 â€Å"The Revolt of ‘Mother’† by Mary E. Wilkins Freeman and Trifles by Susan Glaspell: Where’s The Power Of Feminism ? In the late nineteenth century, America was considered as a patriarchal society. Where males had all control and women worked as their slave. Women were to support all decisions, cook, clean, conceive children, teach, and remain silent. Women has continuously remained a lower standard than men. Still today, womankind is assumed of as unintelligent, inadequateRead MoreWoman Have Historically Been Trapped In The Domestic Sphere1837 Words   |  8 Pagesthe expectation to quietly follow the demands of their husbands. While feminism began to spread rapidly in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, women still didn’t have right to vote or serve on a jury. As a result, many writers, especially woman, began to produce many pieces of literature that commented on the unfair treatment of woman. One of the highest praised feminist pieces of literature is the one act play, Trifles by Susan Glaspell written in 1916. Based loosely on a murder trial she coveredRead MoreWomen s Rights On The Grounds Of Political, Social, And Economic Equality1508 Words   |  7 PagesGarvin College English 1102 Dr. Summer 3/20/16 Feminism in A Jury of Her Peers Feminism, as defined, is the advocacy of women s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men. Feminist critics strive to weaken this patriarchal hold on society and reveal male bias against women in writing. While these ideas are a well-known concept today, it wasn’t quite as popular back in the 19th century when the play â€Å"Trifles† was written by Susan Glaspell. This play, written in 1916, focusesRead MoreSusan Glaspell s Trifles : Gender Differences And Stereotyping Explored2016 Words   |  9 PagesSusan Glaspell’s Trifles: Gender Differences and Stereotyping Explored Susan Glaspell’s Trifles is a dramatic play with satirical content that points out gender differences and how stereotyping affects perceptions of duty, justice, and law. Glaspell wrote Trifles in 1916, a time in America where women were consistently expected to be housewives and nothing more. Women’s limitations were clearly a spark of inspiration and reason for Glaspell to write Trifles, criticizing society with feministic intelligenceRead MoreSusan Glaspell s A Significant Scene1259 Words   |  6 PagesSusan Glaspell created a significant scene with a short story based on a play written in 1916. A Jury of Her Peers reveals a setting of Dickson County in March, when a farmers lonely wife allegedly murdered her husband and a team of investigators and their wives assembled to search for motive. Women of the time were oppressed and striving to find their way in society while continuing to uphold their family name and producing acceptable households . America was sur ging ahead to World War I andRead MoreGender Roles in the Play Trifles Essay3006 Words   |  13 Pages downfalls, and differences on the subject of gender roles. These pieces of literature have proven the change which has been made over time through the transformation of gender classification. Literature such as this is what has made a better understanding and sense of relief on this suppressing stereotype. Opening up the ideology of gender roles, there are many things that determine how we associate gender and sex with peoples’ identities. The article, â€Å"The Context of Current Content Analysis

Drug Abuse And Addiction Have Negative Consequences For...

â€Å"Drug abuse and addiction have negative consequences for individuals and for society† (DrugFacts: Understanding Drug Abuse and Addiction | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), n.d.). Whether it is illegal substances or it is prescription over use, drug addiction can affect the 18 year old college student or the 70 year old grandmother. Even though drug addiction is still a growing and constant problem each model is fighting to get this problem under control. In this paper we will discuss how each of the models address this issue. We will also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of how each model is addressing the problem. Directly following the above we will examine detoxification centers and Narcotics Anonymous and how they are helping to fight the battle against drug addiction. First let’s look at how the medical model address addiction. People often look at drug addiction as something that can be avoided they may think that people become addicted because they have poor self-control or because they lack morals. This is sadly not the case. Addiction is a disease that is treatable but not curable (DrugFacts: Understanding Drug Abuse and Addiction | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), n.d.). Because it is a chronic disease it must be treated not only for the present symptoms but for the long term effects as well. â€Å"A medical model, emphasizing biological and genetic or physiological causes of addiction that require treatment by a physician and utilizeShow MoreRelatedAddiction: a Three Part Disease1072 Words   |  5 PagesWright, M.A. English 1301-Composition M-W 1:30 pm – 2:50 pm Ricardo Ballinas Addiction: A Three Part Disease October 1st, 2012 Sue Wright Addiction: A Three Part Disease Addiction can be separated into three categories: mind (neurological), body (physical), and spirit (psychological). Within in this breakdown addiction can possibly be explained and properly understood. In order to better understand addiction as a disease as opposed to a moral dilemma it first must be broken down. FirstRead MoreAddiction and Society1244 Words   |  5 PagesAddiction and Society Sociology Professor Trembicki February 22, 2013 Abstract Drug addiction is a disease that damages addicts, their families, communities, the economy, and society. Addiction has a widespread reach: from dealing with unpredictable and often dangerous addicts at home to the costs incurred by society as a whole. As the population of addicts rises and the average age of an addict is younger, society is forced to deal with a pressing matter. Addiction is no longer limitedRead MoreThe Effects Of Drug Addiction1074 Words   |  5 PagesDrug abuse is a rampant problem in the United States. Drug usage and consumption has grown over the years. Drug addiction is a dilemma that has greatly increased among our current day society. Addiction is a serious problem. This can be defined as continued involvement with a substance or activity despite ongoing negative consequence. Narcotics like marijuana, heroin, crystal meth and crack cocaine are generally called drugs. Men and woman either take these drugs orally or inhale them. Drugs, otherRead MoreThere I s Hope for the Drug Addicted932 Words   |  4 PagesAccording to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, â€Å"Addiction is defined as a chronic, relapsing brain disease that is characterized by compulsive drug seeking and use, despite harmful consequences. It is considered a brain disease because drugs change the brain; they change its structure and how it works. These brain changes can be long lasting and can lead to many harmful, often self-destructive, behaviors† (NIH, WEB). Many people in society struggle with drug abuse. â€Å"An estimated 208 million peopleRead MoreEssay on Alcohol vs Marijuana1537 Words   |  7 Pages(kinds) of drugs. Despite the well-known consequences of drug addiction, millions of people constantly consume different legal and illegal drugs. Affecting peoples mind and changing their behavior, drugs become one of the most threatening factors of social risk, resulting in increasing rates of mortality, aggressive and criminal behavior, and dissoluti on of social ties. This paper is devoted to comparison of social science outcome characteristics for two of the most commonly used drugs in the groupsRead MoreDrug Abuse And The Consequences Of Drug Addiction1593 Words   |  7 PagesDrug addiction has become prevalent in our societies today such as the use of heroin. Using Marc, Lewis (2011) text â€Å"Memoirs of an Addicted Brain: A Neuroscientist Examines his Former Life on Drugs† this paper focuses on drug abuse, heroin, and the consequences that the users face as they battle their addiction and related problems. In the text, chapter 8 provides a significant background and overview of Heroin as a drug, hence major section of this paper will rely on facts provided within this chapterRead Moredrug addiction802 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿INTRODUTION Drug addiction is the chronic disease affecting the brain, and just everyone is different. Drug affect different ways. One person can take and abuse drugs, yet never become addicted, while another merely has one experience and is immediately hooked. Addiction explain and is charactererized by a person having to used the drugs repeatedly, regardless of the damage it does to their health, family career, and their rrelationshipwith friends and the community. Addiction is not limited to drugs a ndRead Moreearly marriage779 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿Ã¢â‚¬Å"DRUG ADDICTION† A Research Paper submitted to: Maria Victoria V. Balaga Don Pablo Lorenzo Memorial High School In partial fulfillment of the requirements in English IV By: MARK ATLEY INSONG GALVEZ MARIA AI AQUINO HIGA RAIZA VALERIANO JAWARI JOSE ENRIQUEZ NATIVIDAD JR HARVEY MORALES TATI IV-Adelfa Introduction-drug addiction is a very common problem. That usually under the business. addicted Isn’t using drugs. It about what the drug does toRead MoreEffects Of Substance Use And Abuse950 Words   |  4 PagesImpact of Substance Use and Abuse Even at this age of raised healthcare awareness there are people who still do not understand the real cause of addictions. A review of Lawrence and Melinda Smith’s article, â€Å"Drug Abuse and Addiction,† reveals that by now there is little and scanty information on why and how people get addicted to various types of drugs. There have been several misconceptions and beliefs as to why people actually use or abuse drugs, several explanations have been put forth for this courseRead MoreBiopsychosocial Model Essay1381 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction The drug epidemic in the United States has been enlightening. Illegal drugs have cost the United States approximately 600 billion in total costs to the economy including lost wages. The biopsychosocial model is a combination of biology (body) and social, psychological (mind, and community (social). The biopsychosocial model provided a holistic approach to medicine. The biopsychosocial approach systematically considers biological, psychological and social factors and their complex interactions

Management Theory of Ford and Taylorism †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Management Theory of Ford and Taylorism. Answer: Ford and Taylorism The world has faced change since the first introduction of Taylorism theory in the first half of 20th century since its first application in the Ford automobile company for producing cheap car in less time. Australia, America and Europe are now considered as the developed part of the world and the workers here will not accept Taylorism in current era, at least not in its original form. However, the principles of Taylorism obviously have their ever-lasting efficiency. As the technology and automation has considerably changed with time, there is no wisdom in completely applying the theory established a century ago. A level of modification needs to be done before applying the theory for getting absolute outcome (Waring 2016). The format of Taylorism is clearly visible in call centres to some extent, as they follow similar principle and structure as proposed by Taylor for improving work efficiency. Weeding out of unnecessary physical movement of the worker, less time consuming production, attractive packages for the employees, division of labor and lack of trade unions are the core principle of Taylorism that are similar to some extent in the call centres. Division of labour can be identified, as the operations are divided into different sectors specialising in niche. The job roles are assigned to the employees accordingly to their area of expertise (wordpress.com 2017). Definitely these ideas can certainly be implemented in some of the industries around the world as the ideas may be old, but the principles behind are not time-bound. The possibilities of the theory are limitless and can still be applied in various industries with required changes. Though thescientific management theory proposed by Taylor is a century old, the principles that are coined in the theory have ever-lasting effect. Principles such as simple production, rewarding hard work, division of work, assembly line and others are the golden rules for any start-up or existing businesses of any sectors. The application of these principles with correct modification based on correct industry and correct time can provide limitless outcomes and guarantee success in the particular domain (youtube.com 2017). Personal Experience Taylorism theory according to my opinion is an effective tool to improve work efficiency of an organization. With moderate changes, the theory can be promising in a wide range of industries in every part of the world Definition of Culture Definition of culture varies with individual, as culture is dynamic. People belonging from different parts of the world, representing their own culture have different worldview. This is the reason behind the variation in the definitions of culture over time as the culture itself is changing over time. The culture adopts itself with time and space depending on the environment, hence, changing the carries itself. It can be referred as the survival mechanism; moulds with the nature to ensure the survival of the humanity (Heine 2015). Culture of American society is different from the culture of the Trobrian islanders of Australia as their survival needs widely varies. As proposed by Edward Burnet Tylore, culture is dynamic and it is ever changing (Saler 2015). Hence, the mind-set of different individual varies widely as their culture varies, with it varies their worldview. Definition of the organizational culture as proposed by Abdi Osman Jama can considered being most appropriate in the matter. As quoted by him An organization is a living culture that can adapt to the reality as fast as possible is more meaningful than the rest. However, Richard Perrins definition also bears strong meaning, but Jamas definition has more truth in it. According to Jama, culture is dynamic and shift incrementally and constantly responding to the internal and external changes. This definition terminates the notion of the culture as a mirror image of the leader of an organization. Culture of an organization is under constant change and adaptation with the external environment as it supposes to be for overcoming any situation that occurs. Hence, it is pointless to try to assess organizational culture. It also opens up endless possibilities for managing the culture in the continuum. Culture of an organization has to be ever adopting and learning to cope up with the changing world and its economy. The stagnant organizational culture is likely to get extinct (hbr.org 2017). Personal Experience According to my experience, the organizational culture likely to change in due course of time in order to survive. McDonald faced similar challenge and was criticized as dinosaur culture and faced the threat of extinction. It is for Steve Easterbrook the company adopted its present culture and avoided the threat. Conclusion Conclusion can be drawn from the above discussion that of activity 1, that the scientific mechanics theory is still effective after a century. The principles of the theory can be used, obviously with considerable modification on their implementation grounds. Activity 2 is based on the discussion of organizational culture. The first part of the discussion is an analytical part was reasons behind different definitions have been discussed. Second part of the discussion is comprised of the best suited definition of organizational culture with clarification. References hbr.org. (2017).organizational culture. [online] Available at: https://hbr.org/2013/05/what-is-organizational-culture [Accessed 18 Aug. 2017]. Heine, S.J., 2015.Cultural Psychology: Third International Student Edition. WW Norton Company. Saler, B., 2015. EB Tylor and the Anthropology of Religion.Marburg Journal of Religion,2(1). wordpress.com. (2017).Ford and Taylorism. [online] Available at: https://veerpals.wordpress.com/2015/08/10/ford-and-taylorism/ [Accessed 18 Aug. 2017]. Waring, S.P., 2016.Taylorism transformed: Scientificmanagement theory since 1945. UNC Press Books. youtube.com. (2017).Ford and Taylor Scientific Management. [online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PdmNbqtDdI [Accessed 18 Aug. 2017].

Sienkiewicz vs Greif free essay sample

From 1966 until 1984 she was an office worker at the defendants factory premises. The defendant manufactured steel drums and during the course of this process, asbestos dust was released into the factory atmosphere. Although Mrs Costello did not work on the factory floor, her duties took her all over the premises. In common with other inhabitants of the local area, however, she would also have been exposed to a low level of asbestos in the general atmosphere. Causation The general rule at common law is that a person suffering injury must show on the balance of probabilities that the defendants tort (most commonly negligence) caused the injury or condition. But for the defendants wrongdoing, the claimant would not have suffered the damage (this is sometimes called the but for test). There is an important exception to this rule. In the case of a divisible disease such as pneumoconiosis, the amount of dust  inhaled operates cumulatively to cause the disease and determine its severity. If exposure to the dust is partly due to the defendants negligence and partly not, the defendant will be liable to the extent that his breach of duty has materially contributed to the disease. If there is more than one defendant, liability can be apportioned. This approach, however, causes difficulties in mesothelioma claims because, unlike pneumoconiosis or asbestosis, mesothelioma is an indivisible disease. It is still uncertain whether its contraction or its severity can be  related to the amount of asbestos fibres ingested, or even which fibres triggered the disease. In Fairchild v Glenhaven [2003], the House of Lords (as it then was) recognised that, in a mesothelioma case where the claimant had been exposed to asbestos at different times while working for different employers, it would be impossible to satisfy the conventional but for test and prove which exposure was the cause of the disease. Consequently, the Law Lords created another exception to the normal causation rule. In mesothelioma cases, it would be enough for the claimant to show that a negligent exposure had materially increased the risk of his developing the disease. In Barker v Corus [2006], the House of Lords went on to decide that, in cases where there had been successive negligent exposures, liability should be apportioned between defendants. Each employer would be liable for that proportion of the damage which represented his contribution to the risk that the employee would contract mesothelioma. Parliament, however, swiftly intervened to pass section 3 of the Compensation Act, which allows the claimant to obtain full compensation from any one of them. The section applies where (1) a person has negligently or in breach of statutory duty exposed the victim to asbestos and (2) the victim has contracted mesothelioma as a result of exposure to asbestos, but (3) it is not possible to determine with certainty whether it was this or another exposure which caused the disease and (4) the person in question is liable in tort whether by reason of having materially increased a risk or for any other reason.    The defendant in this case said that any negligent exposure to asbestos fibres while Mrs Costello was at work would have been minimal and far less than the environmental exposure, which was not negligent. It argued that the Fairchild exception did not apply because this was a single exposure– in other words, the defendant was the sole known source of occupational exposure to asbestos dust. In any event, the exposure was not material. According to the defendant, the appropriate causation test to apply was a doubles the risk test. Only if the occupational exposure could be shown to have at least doubled the risk of Mrs Costello contracting mesothelioma could the defendant be held liable. The judge at first instance agreed and concluded that Mrs Costellos exposure to asbestos at work increased the risk by only 18%. The claimant appealed, arguing that the judge had failed to apply the law correctly. The Court of Appeal judgment The Court of Appeal found that the proper test was whether the occupational exposure had materially increased the risk of contacting the disease. In its view, Fairchild effectively created a new tort limited to cases of mesothelioma the tort of negligently materially increasing the risk of injury. Section 3 of the Compensation Act made it law that, provided all four conditions were satisfied, causation could be proved by demonstrating that the defendant wrongfully materially increased the risk of the victim contracting mesothelioma. It did not matter whether the other exposure was negligent or non-negligent. The claimant could prove causation by any available method, including showing a material (i. e. more than minimal) increase in risk. The defendant appealed. The Supreme Court judgment The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal. The Fairchild exception was developed for mesothelioma cases because of ignorance about the biological cause of the disease. Under it, a defendant is liable if it materially increases the risk of the claimant contracting mesothelioma. The same principle applies whether it is a case of single exposure or multiple exposure. The Court of Appeal, however, had misread the Compensation Act as creating a statutory rule of causation. Section 3 merely provides that, if a defendant negligently exposed the claimant to asbestos and the claimant contracts mesothelioma, the defendant would be liable in tort whether by reason of having materially increased a risk or for any other reason. Whether and in what circumstances liability attached to the defendant was still a matter for the common law. The Supreme Court, however, considered that the doubles the risk test put forward by the defendant was unsuitable as a test for causation in mesothelioma cases. The idea is borrowed from epidemiology, which is the study of the occurrence and distribution of events such as disease over human populations. If statistical evidence indicates that the wrongdoers act has more than doubled the risk that the victim would suffer the injury, the argument goes that it is more likely than not that the wrongdoer caused the injury. The Supreme Court concluded that, as long as medical science is unable to demonstrate the exact origin of mesothelioma, data relating incidence to exposure was not a satisfactory basis for making findings of liability. What constitutes a material increase in risk? Something more than minimal. But Lord Phillips said: I doubt whether it is ever possible to define in quantitative terms what for the purposes of the application of any principle of law is de minimis. This must be a question for the judge on the facts of the particular case.    He continued: In the case of mesothelioma, a stage must be reached at which, even allowing for the possibility that exposure to asbestos can have a cumulative effect, a particular exposure is too insignificant to be taken into account, having regard to the overall exposure that has taken place. This case involved low levels of exposure. But currently there is no known lower threshold of exposure that determines whether or not a person contracts the disease. In any event, the Supreme Court was satisfied that the exposure in this case materially increased Mrs Costellos risk of developing mesothelioma. Commentary The decision could  pave the way for claims by mesothelioma victims who have been exposed to levels of asbestos that, until now, might  have been considered too low to be actionable. The Supreme Court judges resisted any attempt to limit the applicability of the Fairchild exception or the Compensation Act to multiple exposure mesothelioma cases. As Lord Phillips commented: The 2006 Act, coupled with Fairchild, has draconian consequences for an employer who has been responsible for only a small proportion of the overall exposure of a claimant to asbestos dust, or his insurers, but it would be wrong to have regard to that fact when considering the issues raised by these appeals. Parliament has willed it so. Comments made by some members of the Supreme Court, however, questioned the wisdom of creating special causation rules, even for such a disease as mesothelioma. Lord Brown doubted whether special treatment could be justified. Although [†¦] mesothelioma claims must now be considered from the defendants standpoint a lost cause, there is in my mind a lesson to be learned from losing it: the law tempers with but for test of causation at its peril. Lord Rodger looked forward to a day when medical science can identify which fibre or fibres caused the disease, at which point the problem that gave rise to the Fairchild exception will have ceased to exist.